Homosexuality

[CoreIssue]

There is yet another belief, once again, that is running like wild-fire amongst the church denominations and that is the belief thats its completely moral to be what we calla "homosexual" in these modern times. However, the intent of this document is to show and to prove that this should never be the case and that the Bible condemns such a practice. This document will most likely be very controversial for a lot of people, but thats alright. Christ Jesus was murdered for what he taught and for people to merely spout of name-calling is much less than what Christ suffered. Be that as it may, this document will present this evidenceMisleading.

Yes, there are far too many in these Apostate times believing it is moral.

But no, many reject it is moral, including the vast majority here on CTZ. So we do not disagree it is immoral.

[Calebnostro]

I would ask that you kindly keep my article in context on how I stated that this belief is running like wild-fire amongst the church denominations. I did not say that everyone thinks it is moral or ethical to be so, but that its becoming so and a lot believe this way already.

[CoreIssue]

I would ask that you kindly keep my article in context on how I stated that this belief is running like wild-fire amongst the church denominations. I did not say that everyone thinks it is moral or ethical to be so, but that its becoming so and a lot believe this way already.
I did not say everyone, I said many. And that is what your contextual usage implies, majority.

Every been in a wildfire? I have. It sweeps everything in its path.

I suggest you clarify your above statement a bit to be clearer. Wide spread would be a much better choice than wild-fire.

[Calebnostro]

Is this really the contention of this entire thread? An improper placement of a word thats not even the core of the entire article?

I didnt write that article for you or anyone else to nit-pick at little things while not even addressing anything else, which are even more important than a single misplaced word.

[CoreIssue]

Is this really the contention of this entire thread? An improper placement of a word thats not even the core of the entire article?

I didnt write that article for you or anyone else to nit-pick at little things while not even addressing anything else, which are even more important than a single misplaced word.
Yeesh! I agreed homosexuality was wrong and was telling you that. What else do you want?

I made one point about the scale of the problems in churches.

But when you write something you want others to read you have no right to say others cannot critique it. You don't belong in debates if you are going to be that hypersensitive.

I made a suggestion to improve it. Use it or don't but my point stands. Words convey meanings and impressions. Yours conveyed one that most will see as I did.

You want a comment on some aspect of your presentation then post that aspect and it will get a response. No problem.

[Calebnostro]

I would imagine you would feel the same as I would if the first thing I critiqued concerning your entire article was clarification of something that means the same in general context, but in a different way in the first paragraph as if that would be the important contentions to deal with first and foremost.

The issue is not the first paragraph, its the evidence of the scriptures that condemn homosexuality as a sinful practice. I can re-word certain things later. That thing is not the issue.

[CoreIssue]

I would imagine you would feel the same as I would if the first thing I critiqued concerning your entire article was clarification of something that means the same in general context, but in a different way in the first paragraph as if that would be the important contentions to deal with first and foremost.

The issue is not the first paragraph, its the evidence of the scriptures that condemn homosexuality as a sinful practice. I can re-word certain things later. That thing is not the issue.
Actually, I don't see anything in the article that changes what I said.

I mentioned that point because your site is painting a broad negative rejection of millions of Christians and it came across here as an exaggeration adding to that endeavor.

As I said, it matters in viewing the purpose of your site in my perception. If not in yours then we simply disagree on the point.