I can only IMAGINE the police @ Quebec summit

[John Beckett]

`

President Bush, PM Harper and Presidente`Calderon will be meeting in Quebec some time next week, and I am sure the NAFTA Superhighway will be among the major topics discussed.

I will be watching the news to see the riots, which I am sure will take place around the outskirts of the high-end resort hotel that the talks will be held in.

It is so amazing to watch the events leading up to the coming out of the son of Perdition unfold right before our very eyes, eh??

Keep looking up. :nod:

[CoreIssue]

Yep.

It is shocking more don't understand this Super Highway thing is real, not folk lore.

[kay-gee]

Do you mean a real highway? That would be a good thing. No?

all the best...

[a.baker]

What is the Super Highway? :scratch:What, Bush is taking a break from his vacation?Ha Ha Ha Every time I see him he makes a quick appearance and goes back on vacation:grr:. War is not time for a vacation. What is Perdition?

[CoreIssue]

A highway, no national border checks, from Canada to Mexico. Free flow of commerce, people and businesses. Joint government.

Not a good thing. No North American EU here.

[a.baker]

What are they crazy? Why would they even consider that? :swoon:

[John Beckett]

`

They would consider it because it is one step closer to
a One World Gov't.

There is already an Arab League of Nations, a European Union,
an African Union --yes, you read that correctly-- and very soon,
there will be a North American Union.

And the UN or something new will one day head them all.

So incredible to actually witness! Isn't it? :end:

[CoreIssue]

Well, there never will be a true one world government.

The EU will be the power broker.

They will be the power, have nations that bow to their will and count on the rest to fear them so much to not be a threat.

But the whole world under one leader? No.

At the Second Coming, it is the armies (plural) of the world along side the AC and his army.

When I read Daniel, it is pretty clear some distant nations will never bow to him.

[Jessie]

quote:
But the whole world under one leader? No.

could you explain, this one is confusing for me.

[kay-gee]

I see a tri-lateral North American co-operative as a good thing. I don't understand why everytime we make a move toward advancement, you percieve it as evil. Does not the pooling of vital resources make for stronger leverage politically when dealing with other continents that have done so?
As for an African Union...the most dis-jointed un-unified continent on Earth. They couldn't get two tribes to unify on anything much less all 27 countries!
You guys gotta remember where we are in history. This aint 1776!

all the best...

[CoreIssue]

quote:
But the whole world under one leader? No.

could you explain, this one is confusing for me.
Nothing in the Bible says there will ever be a One World Goverment under one man.

Simple as that.

A doctrinal thinking has developed which takes verses about the AC having world wide power and equating it to world wide rule.

At Mid, the AC is confronted by an opposing force from the West. He retreats.

That means he feared that force. Definitely didn't control it.

Armies at Argmageddon, not one army.

Rome had a large amount of land within its borders. It further controlled countries, outside its borders, by intimigation.

But it never ruled the whole world.

When the Bible speaks of Babylon and Rome ruling the world, it is referring to the world as being within the framework of its activities, not physically the whole world.

Rome never ruled North America, in example. Didn't even know it existed.

So, it was outside the 'world' of Europe and the Mid East.

They new Africa existed, but didn't rule it, either.

[CoreIssue]

I see a tri-lateral North American co-operative as a good thing. I don't understand why everytime we make a move toward advancement, you percieve it as evil. Does not the pooling of vital resources make for stronger leverage politically when dealing with other continents that have done so?
As for an African Union...the most dis-jointed un-unified continent on Earth. They couldn't get two tribes to unify on anything much less all 27 countries!
You guys gotta remember where we are in history. This aint 1776!

all the best...
We don't want your Canadian liberalism and ecumenical thinking. Or Mexican society. Any part of it.

You would not want the Mexican corruption or social structure.

What is so hard to understand they are talking about merging and homogonizing the three countries into one? And that is not acceptable, to us, period.

We totally disagree with Canadian and Mexican thinking, on many issues. As you disagree with us.

You don't share a border with Mexico. We do. It ain't pretty dealing with them.

[roman8]

You are so right Core on the canadian liberalism , in fact, it is a sorce of pride with so many here. :ick:

They pat themselves on the back because they are so tolerant , its sickning.

[John Beckett]

`

KAY-GEE SAID: I see a tri-lateral North American co-operative as a good thing. I don't understand why everytime we make a move toward advancement, you percieve it as evil.

Kay, nice to meet you. :tiphat:

As for my attitude towards a NAU, my problem isn't so much with that. In fact, I
can see some positive repercussions. However, my point is simply that the merger
of these three huge nations [land-wise, among other things] is one step closer to
making it that much easier for a one-world system to come about.

The United Nations is already head of SO MANY nations all by itself, and the US
is actually stronger than they are, with more political influence. So, it can be done.

Eventually!

And this merger will bring us that much closer.

It won't be a matter of how much evil can result from it, but rather it will be a
matter of how much evil will be used!

And from what i have deduced from studying Bible Prophecy over the course of
the last 16 years, that will be a lot! More than at any other time in world history!

:aah:

[a.baker]

I know way more about Mexico than Canada. Mexico is where a lot of our drugs here in the U.S. come from and gangs as well. If you look at the population of the race of different gang families Mexicans rank as #1 compared to any other race. They are (believe it or not) the most brutal as well. Drugs are constantly being smuggled in inside any container or place of a vehicle you can imagine. Yes the U.S. makes their own to but the main resource is still from Mexico. I also don't like the fact that you can cross the "border" with the future Super Highway while you are in the middle of the U.S. And spending billions of dollars at the pit stop in Kansas, a tornado state is beyond me. Waste of money. Good old saying " easier isn't always better ".:nod:

[John Beckett]

`

Hi, A.Baker. Please explain pit stop in Kansas to me.

Just curious, that's all. If you mean that there is nothing
there so why put a mega highway there, I beg to differ.

Not because there is so much there, but because there obviously
will be, once the super highway is built.

Taco Bell will put up so many little drive-thru/truck stops on this
new highway from Mexico, there'll have no choice but to name it
the TBF .... Taco Bell Freeway!

ROFL !!! Hahahahahahahahaaaa!!!!! :rofl: :lol:

[a.baker]

Yes nobody wants to live or build anything major in Kansas because it is known for its tornadoes mostly. A lot of flat land there. It will be a Mexican/Canadian exchange. So I did word it wrong but yeah it will be the first and only place where things and people will be checked. Thats a lot of driving in the U.S. with foreign unpredictable traffic.:( Do you know how the entire highway will be secured? Any part of the U.S. in that security? How will the highway be so someone can't just pull over the side of the highway and pretend they have car problems and do something illegal in our country? Will the highway have high walls or razor fence the whole way? I don't like it. It makes me very uneasy! We think we have an immigration, weapon, drug, gang problems now... Would they than change the immigration standards or laws in the U.S.? Or I guess be more tight with them? I don't trust it for a minute. Who would pay for this? What does the U.S. gain from this? And why would Canada want Mexico to have a direct route ? To save future money expense and time? It wouldn't be worth it to me if I owned a business in Canada. Not considering the consequence from it. Since it's government decision I take it there will be no voting on it. And what about the peoples homes or land that might be in the way? Will they just take it away from them? Our rights in the U.S. seem to be slowly disappearing.:( :pray:

[kay-gee]

Boy oh boy. So many things to answer. Core, FYI, The T in NAFTA stands for trade. I seriously doubt that the countries will ever homogenize. Not in your lifetime or mine. The USA is far too proud for that. Canada is a utopia. Mexico is a loose cannon. There is nothing in common with any. If this thing were to really happen, it would be of benefit to you. The mexicans would flock to Canada for free health care, thereby relieving the pressure for you guys. The other thing I want to say is concerning liberalism. How exactly do you deal with California or Massachusetts? We are no more liberal than those two states. Your sky hasn't it fallen yet, has it? When Hilary is at the helm, you are going to be closer to us politically anyway. Gotta learn to relax man, relax!
Hi John Beckett. Pleased to know you. What is so bad about one world government? wouldn't it make sense on so many levels? You know the old saying. "Too many chefs spoil the soup." The more concentrated the administration, the better chance of getting on the same page. The evil question is not relevant. There's a lot of evil taking place with small governments and rogues states as it is. Evil is just a fact of our fallen world. One world government would allow for better management of the evil! You see, that me, not being a prophecy buff, refuse to get caught up in the angst of all these things. Your life here is but a vapour that soon is gone, Learn to enjoy it. The manifest destiny of the planet is Gods problem.
a.baker, you really should come and check Canada out sometime, seeing as you live so close. You would be surprised at the natural beauty and the gentleness of the people. Don't ever think of us like Mexico. We have one of the highest living standards in the world. Actually the best marijuana in the world comes from Canada (British Columbia) I am not proud to report that. You raise some good questions about the Hi-way. The mexicans will probably be in too much of a hurry to get up here, to do much stopping. Who knows. The powers that be will figure all that stuff out.
Roman8 you are quite correct about the attitude. It is the prevailent one, but more so in the urban centres. Around here, there are some pockets of people that are so right wing, they are scary!
Interesting topic eveyone!
all the best...

[John Beckett]

KAY GEE ASKED: What is so bad about one world government?
You know the old saying. "Too many chefs spoil the soup."

ME: Kay, you just don't get what I am saying. The aspect of a One-World Gov't
is not the issue here, but rather the prospect of the actual Fulfillment of Bible Prophecy
in our own lifetime, right before our very eyes! It is just incredible to observe, and it
is also a kick in the Christians' derrieres, telling us to quickly get our houses in order,
because our Lord's Return is nigh!

We here are not yelling "the sky is falling! Everybody hide!" We know the ending
of the story. However, we also know that Jesus Forewarned us of these events
which must take place, and He Commanded us to be watchful!

And so, that is what we are doing. :nod:

[CoreIssue]

KAY GEE ASKED: What is so bad about one world government?
You know the old saying. "Too many chefs spoil the soup."
John is right. You are not getting it.

Under the EU consolidation public Christianity is outlawed.

Under the UN, any religion that believes it is the only way to God is legally practicing genocide.

That should be reason for rejection by any Christian.
Boy oh boy. So many things to answer. Core, FYI, The T in NAFTA stands for trade. I seriously doubt that the countries will ever homogenize. Not in your lifetime or mine.
NAFTA was the doorway to this movement.
The USA is far too proud for that.
Not pride. More freedom loving. And, while weak, far more Christian than either Canada or Mexico.
Canada is a utopia.
:roflmbo:
Mexico is a loose cannon.
More like a Mafia Nation.
There is nothing in common with any.
But still moving that direction.
If this thing were to really happen, it would be of benefit to you.
And cows fly.
The mexicans would flock to Canada for free health care, thereby relieving the pressure for you guys.
That would finish off Canada's struggling budget.
The other thing I want to say is concerning liberalism. How exactly do you deal with California or Massachusetts? We are no more liberal than those two states.
They are states. They are hurting themselves.

They are not the national government.

You guys have it at national and Province levels.

Your sky hasn't it fallen yet, has it? When Hilary is at the helm, you are going to be closer to us politically anyway. Gotta learn to relax man, relax!

Get over it. Ain't gonna happen.

A Republican will be elected next time. Congress will probably come back under Republican control.

I would like to see a conservative 3rd party come in. A good one is trying to form. But willit make it? I don't know.