Noah's Ark [Archive]

CTZonEdit

10-23-2006, 12:07 PM

Thats true that there were 2 of each and that God brought them to the ark. Noah didnt have go out and round them all up, God made sure that they the ones He wanted came to the ark.

Critics say its crazy to think that every animal could fit on the ark but they mistakenly believe that every species ever created was on the ark. Which is not the case. Not every species every created made it on the ark.

The bible does give us insight as to what kinds were going to be on the ark and with that info we know not all kinds made it aboard.

Knowing which ones made it and which ones didnt can shed some light on the creation issues that both critics and many believers have about the bible.

Jessie

10-23-2006, 12:36 PM

could'nt they have left flys behind??? :not:

CTZonEdit

10-23-2006, 01:44 PM

could'nt they have left flys behind??? :not:

:D They can be annoying...but even flies have a purpose in Gods plan. Dont have to like 'em but he did make 'em!

Genesis 7:21-23
21 Every living thing that moved on the earth perished—birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind. 22 Everything on dry land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. 23 Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.

So...from the above how do we logically determine how flies survived?

Chrystalwuzhere

10-23-2006, 02:37 PM

Flies lay their eggs in damp areas, don't they? Or at least, I think they can. Same with skeeters and other pests.

Here's what I found:

Fly Larvae are found in streams and ponds, in water in the holes of tree trunks - anywhere water collects. The larvae of one species of fly lives in pools of crude oil.

http://www.bugsurvey.nsw.gov.au/html/popups/bpedia_12_tol_fl-la-ma.html

They wouldn't need an ark. Neither would the sea-faring creatures such as fish, etc.

CTZonEdit

10-23-2006, 03:34 PM

I believe that the larvae may have survived the 40 days.

But could they also have been on the animals on the ark?

Chrystalwuzhere

10-23-2006, 05:40 PM

Oh....good point! I never thought of those possibilities before. That the animals themselves could be carriers.

Another point....you always have rodents and spiders on ships. Especially where you see supplies being stocked.

CoreIssue

10-24-2006, 11:56 AM

Big question here is how does one define kind?

Is each variety of black bird, in example a kind? Or all blackbirds together a kind?

InTheWind

10-24-2006, 12:14 PM

Would the statement, God created everything and it evolved from there be true?

Chrystalwuzhere

10-24-2006, 01:32 PM

I know that it's true with dogs. Not the physical evolution from a more primitive species, per say. But, dog breeds do evolve. Evidence of that is seen in the cross breeding of different breeds. I'm an avid dog lover, and watch the AKC dog shows. They talk about what breeds a specific dog is descended from. It's quite interesting. I had never thought about it before.

So, is it possible that all dogs descended from two (male and female) dogs that were aboard the ark?

CTZonEdit

10-24-2006, 01:49 PM

I believe a "kind" would be the major classification of a species.

My question is say eagle and a hummingbird are very different in size habits etc. Did the 2 solitary birds making up bird "kind" on the ark spawn all birds we see today? And has there been enough time to adapt into 2 very different birds, eagle and hummingbird.

Or was there a large bird "kind" and a small bird "kind". Toss the ostrich into the mix and it makes it even tougher. :scratch:

Chrystalwuzhere

10-24-2006, 02:19 PM

Well, the 8th chapter of Genesis tells us that Noah had two different types of bird on the ark. He had a raven, and a dove. Perhaps he had more.

CoreIssue

10-24-2006, 06:17 PM

I think the verse kinda answers it.

He said a dove and raven. Not this kind of dove and this kind of raven.

I believe dove is a kind and raven is a kind, in example. All the micro adaptions and such, even today, are not called different species, but sub-species of the main.

Good example with dogs. Stop controlling breeding and they revert to wolves over time.

And chickens. Stop keeping them distinact and they become bantaams.

InTheWind

10-24-2006, 07:36 PM

CoreIssue

10-24-2006, 10:00 PM

The reason i asked if evolution happened since God created all things was if we are to believe in the six day creation then everything that evolved would of had to happen in the last six thousand years.
I tend to believe that everything including the dinos were killed in the flood. :D
Well, if the dinos died then, God would be lying in saying two of all kinds were in the Ark. Right?

No mention of anything dino being created or existing in the 6 days or before the flood.

Plus science does show our world and the dino world were two complete different places.

InTheWind

10-24-2006, 10:39 PM

Well, if the dinos died then, God would be lying in saying two of all kinds were in the Ark. Right?

No mention of anything dino being created or existing in the 6 days or before the flood.

Plus science does show our world and the dino world were two complete different places.

No, it was just stated that God put the animals that He wanted saved in the ark, many were left out.

I didn`t say everything God created six thousand years ago was in the Ark, the dinos could of been here for a million years and killed in the flood.
How do we know for sure, ya can`t say there was no mention of them in the Bible, there was no mention of a lot of beasts. And if God could make only the animals He wanted saved to come to the Ark on their own i`m sure He could of had dinos on the earth somewhere that wern`t around the middle east.
Has there ever been dino bones found in Israel?

CoreIssue

10-24-2006, 10:50 PM

Sorry, ITW, but it does say two of every kind. Not some.

Genesis 6 NIV
18 But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the ark—you and your sons and your wife and your sons' wives with you. 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. 20 Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive.
NASB

18"But I will establish (A (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:18-20;&version=49;#cen-NASB-156A))My covenant with you; and (B (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:18-20;&version=49;#cen-NASB-156B))you shall enter the ark--you and your sons and your wife, and your sons' wives with you.
19"(C (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:18-20;&version=49;#cen-NASB-157C))And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every kind into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female. 20"(D (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:18-20;&version=49;#cen-NASB-158D))Of the birds after their kind, and of the animals after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of every kind will come to you to keep them alive.

InTheWind

10-25-2006, 09:53 AM

The bible does give us insight as to what kinds were going to be on the ark and with that info we know not all kinds made it aboard.

Knowing which ones made it and which ones didnt can shed some light on the creation issues that both critics and many believers have about the bible.

Why wasn`t something said when this was posted then ?

CoreIssue

10-25-2006, 10:41 AM

I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about what kind meant. Sorry.

CTZonEdit

10-25-2006, 12:36 PM

Well the purpose is to investigate just what kinds were on the ark. So I phrased my statement in order to see if we would could get to a key point in the discussion.

Now we have arrived at a key point that many overlook or get confused about and that is the dinosaur issue.

Yes all kinds that were alive at the time of the flood were on the ark as the verses state.

Now what (if any) about the kinds that were already extinct?

Remember there is no mention of a dinosaur kind being made during the 6 days.
There is no mention of dinos during the period from Adam to Noah.

Add in if dinos were on the ark there would be some alive today. Where are they?

Chrystalwuzhere

10-25-2006, 02:15 PM

Now what (if any) about the kinds that were already extinct?

Remember there is no mention of a dinosaur kind being made during the 6 days.
There is no mention of dinos during the period from Adam to Noah.

Add in if dinos were on the ark there would be some alive today. Where are they?

Destroyed in the pre-adamic flood?

If the answer is no, then I have my dunce cap ready and waiting.

:tease:

InTheWind

10-25-2006, 05:24 PM

If anyone knows are there any dino bones in the Middle East? More importantly in the area of where Noah was.:):

InTheWind

10-26-2006, 10:17 AM

If anyone knows are there any dino bones in the Middle East? More importantly in the area of where Noah was.:):

No replies eh. :scratch:

Here`s what im thinking, the animals in the Ark had to come from the area where Noah lived i don`t think animals, insects or reptiles bought plane or ship tickets to get there from here.
The reason i asked if they have found dino bones in the Middle East was because as far as we know it has always been hot and a desert there, no way dinos could have lived there. But we have found dino bones here so why couldn`t there have been dinos here during Noah's time. Noah wouldn`t of known it or the writers of the Bible for that matter, how could something they new nothing about be talked about, the US isn`t in the Bible either but it`s here.
I can`t rule out that everything including the dinos were wiped out in the flood from Noah's time.

CoreIssue

10-26-2006, 11:49 AM

No replies eh. :scratch:
I was waiting for CTZ. He must be busy.
Here`s what im thinking, the animals in the Ark had to come from the area where Noah lived i don`t think animals, insects or reptiles bought plane or ship tickets to get there from here.
At that time there was only one massive continent. Even the Bible says the land was not divided until long after the Flood.

So all the animals could reach the ark overland. And the climate was far different then than now.
The reason i asked if they have found dino bones in the Middle East was because as far as we know it has always been hot and a desert there, no way dinos could have lived there.
Not true.

In example, where they Sphynx is, it is know that at one time it was a lush heavily vegitated area. Others areas had massive forests and more.

What caused the changes? The land being divided into continents.

And yes, they have found dino fossils in the Mid East. The oil fields are formed from Pre-Adamic life processing into oil.

But we have found dino bones here so why couldn`t there have been dinos here during Noah's time. Noah wouldn`t of known it or the writers of the Bible for that matter, how could something they new nothing about be talked about, the US isn`t in the Bible either but it`s here.

Not right. The US has been the source of many of the dino fossil finds. There are areas known for being rich in them.
I can`t rule out that everything including the dinos were wiped out in the flood from Noah's time.
You should be able to.

The Bible says two of every kind. Zero dinos mentioned in any way in the Bible. Zero dinos alive today. Zero archaelogical finds where dino times life and life of today are found together.

There isn't a single scrap of evidence of dinos co-exsiting with Manr or the life we know.

Further, in the Pre-Adamic thread, there are passages given stating the prophet looked back in time to when all life on the earth was destroyed. The cities were leveled and no life was to be found.

Since Adam, that has never been a reality on this earth. Ever.

There is good reason, evidence and scriptural proof for Pre-Adamic life.

Genesis does not say many of the things were created, during the 6 days, from nothingness. It says many of the things were taking what already existed and reforming them.

And more.

CoreIssue

10-26-2006, 11:49 AM

Destroyed in the pre-adamic flood?

If the answer is no, then I have my dunce cap ready and waiting.

:tease:
Put it back on the shelf. You don't need it.

InTheWind

10-26-2006, 02:59 PM

Guess i do. :aah:

Chrystalwuzhere

10-26-2006, 03:14 PM

Guess i do. :aah:

Not at all, my sweet brother. :hug:

There are some things in other threads (like the "What are demons" thread) that I just can't get. It doesn't mean we're dunce. So, stop that! This is the fun of learning. It makes us think.

Here, have some cake. :shortcake:

InTheWind

10-26-2006, 06:35 PM

I`m not upset, but thanks for the kind words sis. :hug:
I`m not convinced in any of it and don`t believe there is any way to prove one theory over another. There are many different views about it and everyone can`t be right.
On one hand it was said that not every kind was on the ark then your saying every kind was, which is it.
Too me a pre Adamic theory or gap theory or any other theory doesn`t mean a hill of beans too the real message of the New Testament, it`s salvation that`s the most important.
The rest of it is all history and something to fight and kill each other over and they have been doing it for a long time., but that`s just my opinion.:D
Not knocking anyones ideas just don`t think any of it`s provable, interesting maybe. :):

CoreIssue

10-26-2006, 08:56 PM

You are right it does not make a hill of beans regarding salvation.

BUT, it does aid us in understand much of the rest of God's word. And is especially important in witnessing to others.

Someone hits you with why should they believe in the Bible when it says dinos were on the earth with Adam and we know they were not. That makes the Bible a myth!

With those who just will not consider Pre-Adamic, the road ends there. They loose the discussion on the spot becaue it has been proven the never co-existed. Beyond a doubt.

That leaves either saying one believes in Pre-Adamic or saying one is not sure, because some do believe in Pre-Adamic. Either of which takes away the argument that the Bible is myth because of the dino issue.

Plus some other doctrinal stuff.

So, no, it is not front and center. But yes, it is important in today's world.

InTheWind

10-26-2006, 09:08 PM

One of my griefs is that there are a lot of things that are not mentioned in the Bible that we know exist.
Like i said before the US isn`t mentioned but we play a big role in world events. And as far as the planet being one mass, are you saying that some animals from the other side of the earth from Noah walked there.
All the animals mentioned in the six day creation wern`t named individually or the beasts where they, and what about that great monster in the ocean that the bible mentions what was that, was it created in the six day creation or had it been there before that.

CoreIssue

10-26-2006, 09:24 PM

One of my griefs is that there are a lot of things that are not mentioned in the Bible that we know exist.
I understand that. But creation is mentioned. The evidence for Pre-Adamic is in the Bible.
Like i said before the US isn`t mentioned but we play a big role in world events. And as far as the planet being one mass, are you saying that some animals from the other side of the earth from Noah walked there.

The planet was one land mass, Pre-Adamic. During the 6 days of creation, all the land mass was together. It did not cover the whole earth, but neither was it separated into continents.

It was separated after Noah.
Genesis 10
25 Two sons were born to Eber:
One was named Peleg, [a (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2010:25&version=31#fen-NIV-260a)] because in his time the earth was divided; his brother was named Joktan.

Science has shown continental drift is real. They have shown the continents do fit together like a puzzle into one land mass.

Pangea (http://geology.com/pangea.htm)

All the animals mentioned in the six day creation wern`t named individually or the beasts where they, and what about that great monster in the ocean that the bible mentions what was that, was it created in the six day creation or had it been there before that.

No. Not all were named. But none that were named were dinos. And as shown it says two of every kind. Not two of some kinds.

Plus, there was no need to deal with water life. God said two of all on the face of the earth and that all on the face of the earth would be killed. Hebrew is clear face of the earth means dry land, not the bodies of water.

__________________
Tell someone about Jesus today, they`ll thank you for it in Heaven soon.

Chrystalwuzhere

10-26-2006, 10:48 PM

Wouldn't the continents shifting like that cause massive earthquakes?

I mean, I believe it happened, because scripture says it did. But, well....wouldn't it have caused massive trembling and shaking of the earth?

InTheWind

10-26-2006, 10:52 PM

You still didn`t answer about the animals on the other side of the earth that would of had to walk to the Ark.
And what was the creature mentioned in the bible in the ocean, i can`t remember it`s name. Is it still there?

CoreIssue

10-26-2006, 10:52 PM

They have never stopped shifting. They are still moving now.

Called plate techtonics. And they do cause earthquakes time to time.

roman8

10-26-2006, 11:24 PM

This is a very interesting thread , You folks ever heard of Kent Hovind he has some great stuff on what happened to the dinos.

Chrystalwuzhere

10-26-2006, 11:26 PM

This is a very interesting thread.

I agree. :popcorn:

CoreIssue

10-27-2006, 09:14 AM

This is a very interesting thread , You folks ever heard of Kent Hovind he has some great stuff on what happened to the dinos.
Yes, I have.

No way to put this politely, he is a fraud.

In example, his Iva Stones have long been known to be frauds. There are tons of the things around.

The funny thing is that some with some real whacky Pre-Adamic views also use them to 'prove' their theories.

You need to read HERE (http://www.religionnewsblog.com/15261/kent-hovind-evangelist-arrested-on-federal-charges) about his legal problems.

His kind of attempts to prove Young Earth, like the supposed human and dino tracks together, have all proven false. Some deliberate and some by innocent mistakes.

There is zero evidence in the fossil and other records, of any type, source or kind, that show dinos and humans or human associated life together.

InTheWind

10-27-2006, 11:26 AM

CoreIssue

10-27-2006, 12:22 PM

There was no land on the other side of the earth. Take all the land that is now, move it together into on huge continent, and that is what was then.

As for the fish, do you mean this one"
Job 41

1 "Can you pull in the leviathan [a (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=22&chapter=41&version=31#fen-NIV-13890a)] with a fishhook

InTheWind

10-27-2006, 04:44 PM

:cannon:

CoreIssue

10-27-2006, 05:13 PM

:laugh:

InTheWind

10-27-2006, 08:39 PM

Well check this out :p

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/taylor-trail.htm

CoreIssue

10-27-2006, 09:19 PM

That claim has been discredited for many years. The Young Earthers simply refuse to listen as they also try to take the verses talking about the past and somehow make them a future prophecy limited to one area of one country.

There was a small, three toed dino. also found in this area.

When conditions were right, the wind blowing across the prints, when dry, weathered them out and they became the so-called human prints.

A TV special addressed this. They had a stencil that laid the prints. When it was dry they wet the ground to mimic it when water was present. Laid down the prints and then let it dry.

Set up a fan to mimic a low wind and let it blow across the prints. Using time lapse photography, you watched the prints errode into exact copies of the supposed human prints.

Why are people so determined to explain away the simple fact God said two of every kind in the ark, there are no dinos today, no mention in the Bible, no fossil or other record of dino times life and human times life being together or anything else?

Not to mention the prophet stating he saw, in the past, all the cities of the earth destroyed and all life gone.

Further, that perfect print. Please! It is digitally enhanced!

CoreIssue

10-27-2006, 09:29 PM

Reading material:

Here (http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/mantrack.html)

InTheWind

10-27-2006, 09:39 PM

:fighting:
You wait i`ll find something. scoffer :p

InTheWind

10-27-2006, 10:06 PM

Naw i give, just having fun. :D
Your probably pretty close to right. :p

Chrystalwuzhere

10-28-2006, 05:03 AM

:jester:

You guys are fun. Give me a chance to read those links and I'm fairly certain I'll have some more questions and comments.

Where's CTZ?

CoreIssue

10-28-2006, 11:38 AM

Gotta have a little fun in life, ITW. ;)

roman8

10-28-2006, 07:50 PM

Yes, I have.

No way to put this politely, he is a fraud.

In example, his Iva Stones have long been known to be frauds. There are tons of the things around.

The funny thing is that some with some real whacky Pre-Adamic views also use them to 'prove' their theories.

You need to read HERE (http://www.religionnewsblog.com/15261/kent-hovind-evangelist-arrested-on-federal-charges) about his legal problems.

His kind of attempts to prove Young Earth, like the supposed human and dino tracks together, have all proven false. Some deliberate and some by innocent mistakes.

There is zero evidence in the fossil and other records, of any type, source or kind, that show dinos and humans or human associated life together.

Sooo.. Do any of you folks believe that everything was created in 6 literal days or do you believe in evolution or something else altogether?

CoreIssue

10-28-2006, 08:15 PM

Sooo.. Do any of you folks believe that everything was created in 6 literal days or do you believe in evolution or something else altogether?

All of that is dealt with in the Pre-Adamic Thread.

I will summarize here.

1. The earth was created in Genesis 1:1. Look at the New Earth to get a feel for what it was like.
2. It had dinos and a company, not a race, of beings on it.
3. When Satan led his rebellion the earth was included.
4. The earth and Pre-Adamics that rebelled were destroyed in Genesis 1:2. The earth became, was not created, chaotic, there was no darkness until verse 2 (darkness, not light, was created), the fallen angels were imprisoned in the Pit, which was created for them and that was the condition when the 6 days began.
5. In the 6 days the Hebrew words show 2 kinds of creation. Minimal was creation from nothingness. Most was taking what was there and shaping it into new or restored forms.
6. Evolution is false. It is a false argument thrown out by many opposed to Pre-Adamic. All was created as is. None evolved.
7. In the Pre-Adamic Thread you will find Biblical proof backing this.

Young earth does not stand up to the Bible, fossil record or any avenues of proof we can use to test it.

CTZonEdit

10-30-2006, 01:59 PM

Now this means that there were two floods for us to ponder. :D

A Preadamic flood and a Noahic flood.

CoreIssue

10-30-2006, 02:50 PM

Now this means that there were two floods for us to ponder. :D

A Preadamic flood and a Noahic flood.
Hmmm. I am not sure if you can call the Pre-Adamic a flood or a complete shattering and intermixing of the surface of the earth.

Never have made up my mind on that one. :scratch:

CTZonEdit

10-30-2006, 04:24 PM

I guess you have to determine what was more destructive the shattering itself, or the flood caused by the shattering and the subsequent freezing? Of course there would be no flood without the shattering so hard to classify.

CoreIssue

10-30-2006, 06:34 PM

Yep. After the shattering was there much left to harm in the flooding?

It is hard to put a name to.

InTheWind

10-30-2006, 11:12 PM

All of that is dealt with in the Pre-Adamic Thread.

I will summarize here.

1. The earth was created in Genesis 1:1. Look at the New Earth to get a feel for what it was like.
2. It had dinos and a company, not a race, of beings on it.
3. When Satan led his rebellion the earth was included.
4. The earth and Pre-Adamics that rebelled were destroyed in Genesis 1:2. The earth became, was not created, chaotic, there was no darkness until verse 2 (darkness, not light, was created), the fallen angels were imprisoned in the Pit, which was created for them and that was the condition when the 6 days began.
5. In the 6 days the Hebrew words show 2 kinds of creation. Minimal was creation from nothingness. Most was taking what was there and shaping it into new or restored forms.
6. Evolution is false. It is a false argument thrown out by many opposed to Pre-Adamic. All was created as is. None evolved.
7. In the Pre-Adamic Thread you will find Biblical proof backing this.

Young earth does not stand up to the Bible, fossil record or any avenues of proof we can use to test it.

I believe that what was asked is was the earth made livable for Adam and Eve and was that done in a literal six days and my answer would be yes. :):

CoreIssue

10-30-2006, 11:38 PM

I believe that what was asked is was the earth made livable for Adam and Eve and was that done in a literal six days and my answer would be yes. :):

Maybe I misread.

If that is the case I agree. The earth was redesigned for humanity in 6 days. Literal days.

No evolution.

InTheWind

10-31-2006, 09:09 AM

Sooo.. Do any of you folks believe that everything was created in 6 literal days or do you believe in evolution or something else altogether?

I think the thought here was everything as most people think of as from Adam on. :):

Esoteric

10-23-2007, 01:54 AM

Does it really matter?

Mike

PS Can God create a boulder so big he cant lift it?

CTZonEdit

10-23-2007, 09:21 AM

Yes it does since the bible does not allow for evolution. Making it a false claim.

Esoteric

10-23-2007, 12:35 PM

Yes it does since the bible does not allow for evolution. Making it a false claim.

The Bible doesnt allow for macro evolution... It says nothing about micro evolution... So maybe there was only one big cat and it eventually became some of the big cats we know now...

In the end "were there dinosaurs on the ark?" Is a question for 4th grade CBF... Right up there with "Can God make a stone he cant move?"

Mike

CoreIssue

10-23-2007, 01:14 PM

Does it really matter?

Mike

PS Can God create a boulder so big he cant lift it?
That is a false semantic and logics question to even ask.

CTZonEdit

10-23-2007, 04:07 PM

Micro evolution?

Is actually adaptation built within each species. The bible refers to these as kinds. Each takes after its own kind.

We answer these questions because there are lurkers and people who actually want to know these things. You dismissing them as trivial shows that there are holes in your understanding or studies.

Can God make such a boulder/stone? Any one who has studied logic as it applies to God can answer such a question.

Chrystalwuzhere

10-23-2007, 07:43 PM

Yay...this thread is alive again!

This is a neat thread!

:nod:

preacherbob

10-23-2007, 08:10 PM

Yay...this thread is alive again!

This is a neat thread!

:nod:
I am pretty new on this site. What is SCRAM...booggity, boogity? I have been teaching and preaching the gospel for nearly 40 years and I really do not know what the afore mentioned words are ascribed to. Maybe it's just a site thing but I really need a little help. Rev. Bobby

kay-gee

10-23-2007, 09:10 PM

CoreIssue

10-23-2007, 09:32 PM

CoreIssue

10-23-2007, 09:33 PM

I will not answer for her, but after much pondering on this, I think it is that funny sound that a cartoon character makes when he is spinning his legs to get traction to leave the scene really fast. ala Fred Flintstone etc...

all the best...
booggity, boogity

Millions know what it means and where it comes from.

But let Chrystal have the honor! :tiphat:

Chrystalwuzhere

10-24-2007, 06:48 PM

ROFLOL!!!! Alrighty, then!!!! *rolling up my sleeves to type explanation*

Well, there are really two different places this comes from....

1.) Ray Stevens has a song called, "The Streak." Some of the lyrics of that song are.... "Here he comes, Boogity, Boogity, there he goes, Boogity, Boogity, and he ain't wearin' no clothes! That's why they call him the streak!!!!" It's a song about a guy who goes streakin' all over town and flashin' this redneck guy's wife.

2.) In Nascar, Darrell Waltrip is an announcer, and at the beginning of every race, he says, "Boogity, Boogity, Boogity! Let's go racin' boys!!!" (But, Darrell first heard it from Ray.)

Those are the two most acceptable sources of the word. Luckily for all of you reading this explanation...I didn't take it from EITHER of those!!!!

The person with the correct explanation is.......KAY-GEE!!!!! *crowd applauses loudly*

Yup. It's a cartoonish sound that goes along with my cartoonish horse, Bullet! He used to be in my signature, and poor guy, I ran his widdle wegs clean off!!!! So, I deleted Bullet, but kept the catch-phrase.

And.... one other reason I use it is.... I'm known for it. I've always had it in my signature on Internet forums.

And, also.... Because I just like the way it sounds. It kinda goes along with the "splat" in my location field in my profile.

Yup, I like funny sounding words.

Scram! Splat! Squish! Zip! Bang! Boogity! Boogity!!!!!!

I'm not sure, but this could be the beginning symptoms of insanity. :loco: