PDA

View Full Version : Dangerous Doctrine or Cult?


CoreIssue
02-19-2006, 06:32 PM
There is always an ongoing debate over what the difference between a cult and a dangerous doctrine is.

There are two key issues from which you will see all the other issues stem:
1. The identity of God and Christ:
a. Cults always have another God and another Christ.
b. Dangerous doctrines maintain the true defining of God and Christ.
2. Salvation:
a. Cults depart from salvation by repentance through faith by grace. But be very careful here because they often use the correct words but change the meanings.
b. Dangerous doctrine holders maintain repentance through faith by grace.

Sometimes the line is ultra thin. Such as with Catholicism the official doctrine redefines salvation to works but vast numbers maintain the true meaning while taking part in the other errors.

Many groups are split with parts crossing the line into cultism while others practice false and dangerous doctrines but have not crossed the line.

Very hard area to place groups correctly.

Neachley
04-05-2006, 12:19 PM
One factor I was taught was that 99.9% of cults do not believe in the Trinity. This is always a great question to ask them, and if they say no they don`t believe in it run!

CoreIssue
04-05-2006, 04:09 PM
Good clarification. That is a big part of the identity of God and Christ issues.

Sid
11-28-2006, 10:35 AM
Many groups are split with parts crossing the line into cultism while others practice false and dangerous doctrines but have not crossed the line.

Very hard area to place groups correctly.


This link is a one-stop to use for examining dangerous doctrines and cults:

The Rick A. Ross Institute (http://www.rickross.com/sg_alpha.html)